mirror of
				https://github.com/django/django.git
				synced 2025-10-31 09:41:08 +00:00 
			
		
		
		
	git-svn-id: http://code.djangoproject.com/svn/django/trunk@16915 bcc190cf-cafb-0310-a4f2-bffc1f526a37
		
			
				
	
	
		
			1142 lines
		
	
	
		
			44 KiB
		
	
	
	
		
			Plaintext
		
	
	
	
	
	
			
		
		
	
	
			1142 lines
		
	
	
		
			44 KiB
		
	
	
	
		
			Plaintext
		
	
	
	
	
	
| ==============
 | |
| Making queries
 | |
| ==============
 | |
| 
 | |
| .. currentmodule:: django.db.models
 | |
| 
 | |
| Once you've created your :doc:`data models </topics/db/models>`, Django
 | |
| automatically gives you a database-abstraction API that lets you create,
 | |
| retrieve, update and delete objects. This document explains how to use this
 | |
| API. Refer to the :doc:`data model reference </ref/models/index>` for full
 | |
| details of all the various model lookup options.
 | |
| 
 | |
| Throughout this guide (and in the reference), we'll refer to the following
 | |
| models, which comprise a Weblog application:
 | |
| 
 | |
| .. _queryset-model-example:
 | |
| 
 | |
| .. code-block:: python
 | |
| 
 | |
|     class Blog(models.Model):
 | |
|         name = models.CharField(max_length=100)
 | |
|         tagline = models.TextField()
 | |
| 
 | |
|         def __unicode__(self):
 | |
|             return self.name
 | |
| 
 | |
|     class Author(models.Model):
 | |
|         name = models.CharField(max_length=50)
 | |
|         email = models.EmailField()
 | |
| 
 | |
|         def __unicode__(self):
 | |
|             return self.name
 | |
| 
 | |
|     class Entry(models.Model):
 | |
|         blog = models.ForeignKey(Blog)
 | |
|         headline = models.CharField(max_length=255)
 | |
|         body_text = models.TextField()
 | |
|         pub_date = models.DateTimeField()
 | |
|         mod_date = models.DateTimeField()
 | |
|         authors = models.ManyToManyField(Author)
 | |
|         n_comments = models.IntegerField()
 | |
|         n_pingbacks = models.IntegerField()
 | |
|         rating = models.IntegerField()
 | |
| 
 | |
|         def __unicode__(self):
 | |
|             return self.headline
 | |
| 
 | |
| Creating objects
 | |
| ================
 | |
| 
 | |
| To represent database-table data in Python objects, Django uses an intuitive
 | |
| system: A model class represents a database table, and an instance of that
 | |
| class represents a particular record in the database table.
 | |
| 
 | |
| To create an object, instantiate it using keyword arguments to the model class,
 | |
| then call ``save()`` to save it to the database.
 | |
| 
 | |
| You import the model class from wherever it lives on the Python path, as you
 | |
| may expect. (We point this out here because previous Django versions required
 | |
| funky model importing.)
 | |
| 
 | |
| Assuming models live in a file ``mysite/blog/models.py``, here's an example::
 | |
| 
 | |
|     >>> from blog.models import Blog
 | |
|     >>> b = Blog(name='Beatles Blog', tagline='All the latest Beatles news.')
 | |
|     >>> b.save()
 | |
| 
 | |
| This performs an ``INSERT`` SQL statement behind the scenes. Django doesn't hit
 | |
| the database until you explicitly call ``save()``.
 | |
| 
 | |
| The ``save()`` method has no return value.
 | |
| 
 | |
| .. seealso::
 | |
| 
 | |
|     ``save()`` takes a number of advanced options not described here.
 | |
|     See the documentation for ``save()`` for complete details.
 | |
| 
 | |
|     To create an object and save it all in one step see the ``create()``
 | |
|     method.
 | |
| 
 | |
| Saving changes to objects
 | |
| =========================
 | |
| 
 | |
| To save changes to an object that's already in the database, use ``save()``.
 | |
| 
 | |
| Given a ``Blog`` instance ``b5`` that has already been saved to the database,
 | |
| this example changes its name and updates its record in the database::
 | |
| 
 | |
|     >> b5.name = 'New name'
 | |
|     >> b5.save()
 | |
| 
 | |
| This performs an ``UPDATE`` SQL statement behind the scenes. Django doesn't hit
 | |
| the database until you explicitly call ``save()``.
 | |
| 
 | |
| Saving ``ForeignKey`` and ``ManyToManyField`` fields
 | |
| ----------------------------------------------------
 | |
| 
 | |
| Updating a ``ForeignKey`` field works exactly the same way as saving a normal
 | |
| field; simply assign an object of the right type to the field in question.
 | |
| This example updates the ``blog`` attribute of an ``Entry`` instance ``entry``::
 | |
| 
 | |
|     >>> from blog.models import Entry
 | |
|     >>> entry = Entry.objects.get(pk=1)
 | |
|     >>> cheese_blog = Blog.objects.get(name="Cheddar Talk")
 | |
|     >>> entry.blog = cheese_blog
 | |
|     >>> entry.save()
 | |
| 
 | |
| Updating a ``ManyToManyField`` works a little differently; use the ``add()``
 | |
| method on the field to add a record to the relation. This example adds the
 | |
| ``Author`` instance ``joe`` to the ``entry`` object::
 | |
| 
 | |
|     >>> from blog.models import Author
 | |
|     >>> joe = Author.objects.create(name="Joe")
 | |
|     >>> entry.authors.add(joe)
 | |
| 
 | |
| To add multiple records to a ``ManyToManyField`` in one go, include multiple
 | |
| arguments in the call to ``add()``, like this::
 | |
| 
 | |
|     >>> john = Author.objects.create(name="John")
 | |
|     >>> paul = Author.objects.create(name="Paul")
 | |
|     >>> george = Author.objects.create(name="George")
 | |
|     >>> ringo = Author.objects.create(name="Ringo")
 | |
|     >>> entry.authors.add(john, paul, george, ringo)
 | |
| 
 | |
| Django will complain if you try to assign or add an object of the wrong type.
 | |
| 
 | |
| Retrieving objects
 | |
| ==================
 | |
| 
 | |
| To retrieve objects from your database, you construct a ``QuerySet`` via a
 | |
| ``Manager`` on your model class.
 | |
| 
 | |
| A ``QuerySet`` represents a collection of objects from your database. It can
 | |
| have zero, one or many *filters* -- criteria that narrow down the collection
 | |
| based on given parameters. In SQL terms, a ``QuerySet`` equates to a ``SELECT``
 | |
| statement, and a filter is a limiting clause such as ``WHERE`` or ``LIMIT``.
 | |
| 
 | |
| You get a ``QuerySet`` by using your model's ``Manager``. Each model has at
 | |
| least one ``Manager``, and it's called ``objects`` by default. Access it
 | |
| directly via the model class, like so::
 | |
| 
 | |
|     >>> Blog.objects
 | |
|     <django.db.models.manager.Manager object at ...>
 | |
|     >>> b = Blog(name='Foo', tagline='Bar')
 | |
|     >>> b.objects
 | |
|     Traceback:
 | |
|         ...
 | |
|     AttributeError: "Manager isn't accessible via Blog instances."
 | |
| 
 | |
| .. note::
 | |
| 
 | |
|     ``Managers`` are accessible only via model classes, rather than from model
 | |
|     instances, to enforce a separation between "table-level" operations and
 | |
|     "record-level" operations.
 | |
| 
 | |
| The ``Manager`` is the main source of ``QuerySets`` for a model. It acts as a
 | |
| "root" ``QuerySet`` that describes all objects in the model's database table.
 | |
| For example, ``Blog.objects`` is the initial ``QuerySet`` that contains all
 | |
| ``Blog`` objects in the database.
 | |
| 
 | |
| Retrieving all objects
 | |
| ----------------------
 | |
| 
 | |
| The simplest way to retrieve objects from a table is to get all of them.
 | |
| To do this, use the ``all()`` method on a ``Manager``::
 | |
| 
 | |
|     >>> all_entries = Entry.objects.all()
 | |
| 
 | |
| The ``all()`` method returns a ``QuerySet`` of all the objects in the database.
 | |
| 
 | |
| (If ``Entry.objects`` is a ``QuerySet``, why can't we just do ``Entry.objects``?
 | |
| That's because ``Entry.objects``, the root ``QuerySet``, is a special case
 | |
| that cannot be evaluated. The ``all()`` method returns a ``QuerySet`` that
 | |
| *can* be evaluated.)
 | |
| 
 | |
| 
 | |
| Retrieving specific objects with filters
 | |
| ----------------------------------------
 | |
| 
 | |
| The root ``QuerySet`` provided by the ``Manager`` describes all objects in the
 | |
| database table. Usually, though, you'll need to select only a subset of the
 | |
| complete set of objects.
 | |
| 
 | |
| To create such a subset, you refine the initial ``QuerySet``, adding filter
 | |
| conditions. The two most common ways to refine a ``QuerySet`` are:
 | |
| 
 | |
|     ``filter(**kwargs)``
 | |
|         Returns a new ``QuerySet`` containing objects that match the given
 | |
|         lookup parameters.
 | |
| 
 | |
|     ``exclude(**kwargs)``
 | |
|         Returns a new ``QuerySet`` containing objects that do *not* match the
 | |
|         given lookup parameters.
 | |
| 
 | |
| The lookup parameters (``**kwargs`` in the above function definitions) should
 | |
| be in the format described in `Field lookups`_ below.
 | |
| 
 | |
| For example, to get a ``QuerySet`` of blog entries from the year 2006, use
 | |
| ``filter()`` like so::
 | |
| 
 | |
|     Entry.objects.filter(pub_date__year=2006)
 | |
| 
 | |
| We don't have to add an ``all()`` -- ``Entry.objects.all().filter(...)``. That
 | |
| would still work, but you only need ``all()`` when you want all objects from the
 | |
| root ``QuerySet``.
 | |
| 
 | |
| .. _chaining-filters:
 | |
| 
 | |
| Chaining filters
 | |
| ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
 | |
| 
 | |
| The result of refining a ``QuerySet`` is itself a ``QuerySet``, so it's
 | |
| possible to chain refinements together. For example::
 | |
| 
 | |
|     >>> Entry.objects.filter(
 | |
|     ...     headline__startswith='What'
 | |
|     ... ).exclude(
 | |
|     ...     pub_date__gte=datetime.now()
 | |
|     ... ).filter(
 | |
|     ...     pub_date__gte=datetime(2005, 1, 1)
 | |
|     ... )
 | |
| 
 | |
| This takes the initial ``QuerySet`` of all entries in the database, adds a
 | |
| filter, then an exclusion, then another filter. The final result is a
 | |
| ``QuerySet`` containing all entries with a headline that starts with "What",
 | |
| that were published between January 1, 2005, and the current day.
 | |
| 
 | |
| .. _filtered-querysets-are-unique:
 | |
| 
 | |
| Filtered QuerySets are unique
 | |
| ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
 | |
| 
 | |
| Each time you refine a ``QuerySet``, you get a brand-new ``QuerySet`` that is
 | |
| in no way bound to the previous ``QuerySet``. Each refinement creates a
 | |
| separate and distinct ``QuerySet`` that can be stored, used and reused.
 | |
| 
 | |
| Example::
 | |
| 
 | |
|     >> q1 = Entry.objects.filter(headline__startswith="What")
 | |
|     >> q2 = q1.exclude(pub_date__gte=datetime.now())
 | |
|     >> q3 = q1.filter(pub_date__gte=datetime.now())
 | |
| 
 | |
| These three ``QuerySets`` are separate. The first is a base ``QuerySet``
 | |
| containing all entries that contain a headline starting with "What". The second
 | |
| is a subset of the first, with an additional criteria that excludes records
 | |
| whose ``pub_date`` is greater than now. The third is a subset of the first,
 | |
| with an additional criteria that selects only the records whose ``pub_date`` is
 | |
| greater than now. The initial ``QuerySet`` (``q1``) is unaffected by the
 | |
| refinement process.
 | |
| 
 | |
| .. _querysets-are-lazy:
 | |
| 
 | |
| QuerySets are lazy
 | |
| ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
 | |
| 
 | |
| ``QuerySets`` are lazy -- the act of creating a ``QuerySet`` doesn't involve any
 | |
| database activity. You can stack filters together all day long, and Django won't
 | |
| actually run the query until the ``QuerySet`` is *evaluated*. Take a look at
 | |
| this example::
 | |
| 
 | |
|     >>> q = Entry.objects.filter(headline__startswith="What")
 | |
|     >>> q = q.filter(pub_date__lte=datetime.now())
 | |
|     >>> q = q.exclude(body_text__icontains="food")
 | |
|     >>> print q
 | |
| 
 | |
| Though this looks like three database hits, in fact it hits the database only
 | |
| once, at the last line (``print q``). In general, the results of a ``QuerySet``
 | |
| aren't fetched from the database until you "ask" for them. When you do, the
 | |
| ``QuerySet`` is *evaluated* by accessing the database. For more details on
 | |
| exactly when evaluation takes place, see :ref:`when-querysets-are-evaluated`.
 | |
| 
 | |
| 
 | |
| .. _retrieving-single-object-with-get:
 | |
| 
 | |
| Retrieving a single object with get
 | |
| -----------------------------------
 | |
| 
 | |
| ``.filter()`` will always give you a ``QuerySet``, even if only a single
 | |
| object matches the query - in this case, it will be a ``QuerySet`` containing
 | |
| a single element.
 | |
| 
 | |
| If you know there is only one object that matches your query, you can use
 | |
| the ``get()`` method on a `Manager` which returns the object directly::
 | |
| 
 | |
|     >>> one_entry = Entry.objects.get(pk=1)
 | |
| 
 | |
| You can use any query expression with ``get()``, just like with ``filter()`` -
 | |
| again, see `Field lookups`_ below.
 | |
| 
 | |
| Note that there is a difference between using ``.get()``, and using
 | |
| ``.filter()`` with a slice of ``[0]``. If there are no results that match the
 | |
| query, ``.get()`` will raise a ``DoesNotExist`` exception. This exception is an
 | |
| attribute of the model class that the query is being performed on - so in the
 | |
| code above, if there is no ``Entry`` object with a primary key of 1, Django will
 | |
| raise ``Entry.DoesNotExist``.
 | |
| 
 | |
| Similarly, Django will complain if more than one item matches the ``get()``
 | |
| query. In this case, it will raise ``MultipleObjectsReturned``, which again is
 | |
| an attribute of the model class itself.
 | |
| 
 | |
| 
 | |
| Other QuerySet methods
 | |
| ----------------------
 | |
| 
 | |
| Most of the time you'll use ``all()``, ``get()``, ``filter()`` and ``exclude()``
 | |
| when you need to look up objects from the database. However, that's far from all
 | |
| there is; see the :ref:`QuerySet API Reference <queryset-api>` for a complete
 | |
| list of all the various ``QuerySet`` methods.
 | |
| 
 | |
| .. _limiting-querysets:
 | |
| 
 | |
| Limiting QuerySets
 | |
| ------------------
 | |
| 
 | |
| Use a subset of Python's array-slicing syntax to limit your ``QuerySet`` to a
 | |
| certain number of results. This is the equivalent of SQL's ``LIMIT`` and
 | |
| ``OFFSET`` clauses.
 | |
| 
 | |
| For example, this returns the first 5 objects (``LIMIT 5``)::
 | |
| 
 | |
|     >>> Entry.objects.all()[:5]
 | |
| 
 | |
| This returns the sixth through tenth objects (``OFFSET 5 LIMIT 5``)::
 | |
| 
 | |
|     >>> Entry.objects.all()[5:10]
 | |
| 
 | |
| Negative indexing (i.e. ``Entry.objects.all()[-1]``) is not supported.
 | |
| 
 | |
| Generally, slicing a ``QuerySet`` returns a new ``QuerySet`` -- it doesn't
 | |
| evaluate the query. An exception is if you use the "step" parameter of Python
 | |
| slice syntax. For example, this would actually execute the query in order to
 | |
| return a list of every *second* object of the first 10::
 | |
| 
 | |
|     >>> Entry.objects.all()[:10:2]
 | |
| 
 | |
| To retrieve a *single* object rather than a list
 | |
| (e.g. ``SELECT foo FROM bar LIMIT 1``), use a simple index instead of a
 | |
| slice. For example, this returns the first ``Entry`` in the database, after
 | |
| ordering entries alphabetically by headline::
 | |
| 
 | |
|     >>> Entry.objects.order_by('headline')[0]
 | |
| 
 | |
| This is roughly equivalent to::
 | |
| 
 | |
|     >>> Entry.objects.order_by('headline')[0:1].get()
 | |
| 
 | |
| Note, however, that the first of these will raise ``IndexError`` while the
 | |
| second will raise ``DoesNotExist`` if no objects match the given criteria. See
 | |
| :meth:`~django.db.models.query.QuerySet.get` for more details.
 | |
| 
 | |
| .. _field-lookups-intro:
 | |
| 
 | |
| Field lookups
 | |
| -------------
 | |
| 
 | |
| Field lookups are how you specify the meat of an SQL ``WHERE`` clause. They're
 | |
| specified as keyword arguments to the ``QuerySet`` methods ``filter()``,
 | |
| ``exclude()`` and ``get()``.
 | |
| 
 | |
| Basic lookups keyword arguments take the form ``field__lookuptype=value``.
 | |
| (That's a double-underscore). For example::
 | |
| 
 | |
|     >>> Entry.objects.filter(pub_date__lte='2006-01-01')
 | |
| 
 | |
| translates (roughly) into the following SQL::
 | |
| 
 | |
|     SELECT * FROM blog_entry WHERE pub_date <= '2006-01-01';
 | |
| 
 | |
| .. admonition:: How this is possible
 | |
| 
 | |
|    Python has the ability to define functions that accept arbitrary name-value
 | |
|    arguments whose names and values are evaluated at runtime. For more
 | |
|    information, see `Keyword Arguments`_ in the official Python tutorial.
 | |
| 
 | |
|    .. _`Keyword Arguments`: http://docs.python.org/tutorial/controlflow.html#keyword-arguments
 | |
| 
 | |
| .. versionchanged:: 1.4
 | |
| 
 | |
|     The field specified in a lookup has to be the name of a model field.
 | |
|     There's one exception though, in case of a
 | |
|     :class:`~django.db.models.fields.ForeignKey` you can specify the field
 | |
|     name suffixed with ``_id``. In this case, the value parameter is expected
 | |
|     to contain the raw value of the foreign model's primary key. For example::
 | |
| 
 | |
|         >>> Entry.objects.filter(blog_id__exact=4)
 | |
| 
 | |
| If you pass an invalid keyword argument, a lookup function will raise
 | |
| ``TypeError``.
 | |
| 
 | |
| The database API supports about two dozen lookup types; a complete reference
 | |
| can be found in the :ref:`field lookup reference <field-lookups>`. To give you a taste of what's available, here's some of the more common lookups
 | |
| you'll probably use:
 | |
| 
 | |
|     :lookup:`exact`
 | |
|         An "exact" match. For example::
 | |
| 
 | |
|             >>> Entry.objects.get(headline__exact="Man bites dog")
 | |
| 
 | |
|         Would generate SQL along these lines:
 | |
| 
 | |
|         .. code-block:: sql
 | |
| 
 | |
|             SELECT ... WHERE headline = 'Man bites dog';
 | |
| 
 | |
|         If you don't provide a lookup type -- that is, if your keyword argument
 | |
|         doesn't contain a double underscore -- the lookup type is assumed to be
 | |
|         ``exact``.
 | |
| 
 | |
|         For example, the following two statements are equivalent::
 | |
| 
 | |
|             >>> Blog.objects.get(id__exact=14)  # Explicit form
 | |
|             >>> Blog.objects.get(id=14)         # __exact is implied
 | |
| 
 | |
|         This is for convenience, because ``exact`` lookups are the common case.
 | |
| 
 | |
|     :lookup:`iexact`
 | |
|         A case-insensitive match. So, the query::
 | |
| 
 | |
|             >>> Blog.objects.get(name__iexact="beatles blog")
 | |
| 
 | |
|         Would match a ``Blog`` titled "Beatles Blog", "beatles blog", or even
 | |
|         "BeAtlES blOG".
 | |
| 
 | |
|     :lookup:`contains`
 | |
|         Case-sensitive containment test. For example::
 | |
| 
 | |
|             Entry.objects.get(headline__contains='Lennon')
 | |
| 
 | |
|         Roughly translates to this SQL:
 | |
| 
 | |
|         .. code-block:: sql
 | |
| 
 | |
|             SELECT ... WHERE headline LIKE '%Lennon%';
 | |
| 
 | |
|         Note this will match the headline ``'Today Lennon honored'`` but not
 | |
|         ``'today lennon honored'``.
 | |
| 
 | |
|         There's also a case-insensitive version, :lookup:`icontains`.
 | |
| 
 | |
|     :lookup:`startswith`, :lookup:`endswith`
 | |
|         Starts-with and ends-with search, respectively. There are also
 | |
|         case-insensitive versions called :lookup:`istartswith` and
 | |
|         :lookup:`iendswith`.
 | |
| 
 | |
| Again, this only scratches the surface. A complete reference can be found in the
 | |
| :ref:`field lookup reference <field-lookups>`.
 | |
| 
 | |
| Lookups that span relationships
 | |
| -------------------------------
 | |
| 
 | |
| Django offers a powerful and intuitive way to "follow" relationships in
 | |
| lookups, taking care of the SQL ``JOIN``\s for you automatically, behind the
 | |
| scenes. To span a relationship, just use the field name of related fields
 | |
| across models, separated by double underscores, until you get to the field you
 | |
| want.
 | |
| 
 | |
| This example retrieves all ``Entry`` objects with a ``Blog`` whose ``name``
 | |
| is ``'Beatles Blog'``::
 | |
| 
 | |
|     >>> Entry.objects.filter(blog__name__exact='Beatles Blog')
 | |
| 
 | |
| This spanning can be as deep as you'd like.
 | |
| 
 | |
| It works backwards, too. To refer to a "reverse" relationship, just use the
 | |
| lowercase name of the model.
 | |
| 
 | |
| This example retrieves all ``Blog`` objects which have at least one ``Entry``
 | |
| whose ``headline`` contains ``'Lennon'``::
 | |
| 
 | |
|     >>> Blog.objects.filter(entry__headline__contains='Lennon')
 | |
| 
 | |
| If you are filtering across multiple relationships and one of the intermediate
 | |
| models doesn't have a value that meets the filter condition, Django will treat
 | |
| it as if there is an empty (all values are ``NULL``), but valid, object there.
 | |
| All this means is that no error will be raised. For example, in this filter::
 | |
| 
 | |
|     Blog.objects.filter(entry__authors__name='Lennon')
 | |
| 
 | |
| (if there was a related ``Author`` model), if there was no ``author``
 | |
| associated with an entry, it would be treated as if there was also no ``name``
 | |
| attached, rather than raising an error because of the missing ``author``.
 | |
| Usually this is exactly what you want to have happen. The only case where it
 | |
| might be confusing is if you are using ``isnull``. Thus::
 | |
| 
 | |
|     Blog.objects.filter(entry__authors__name__isnull=True)
 | |
| 
 | |
| will return ``Blog`` objects that have an empty ``name`` on the ``author`` and
 | |
| also those which have an empty ``author`` on the ``entry``. If you don't want
 | |
| those latter objects, you could write::
 | |
| 
 | |
|     Blog.objects.filter(entry__authors__isnull=False,
 | |
|             entry__authors__name__isnull=True)
 | |
| 
 | |
| Spanning multi-valued relationships
 | |
| ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
 | |
| 
 | |
| When you are filtering an object based on a ``ManyToManyField`` or a reverse
 | |
| ``ForeignKey``, there are two different sorts of filter you may be
 | |
| interested in. Consider the ``Blog``/``Entry`` relationship (``Blog`` to
 | |
| ``Entry`` is a one-to-many relation). We might be interested in finding blogs
 | |
| that have an entry which has both *"Lennon"* in the headline and was published
 | |
| in 2008. Or we might want to find blogs that have an entry with *"Lennon"* in
 | |
| the headline as well as an entry that was published in 2008. Since there are
 | |
| multiple entries associated with a single ``Blog``, both of these queries are
 | |
| possible and make sense in some situations.
 | |
| 
 | |
| The same type of situation arises with a ``ManyToManyField``. For example, if
 | |
| an ``Entry`` has a ``ManyToManyField`` called ``tags``, we might want to find
 | |
| entries linked to tags called *"music"* and *"bands"* or we might want an
 | |
| entry that contains a tag with a name of *"music"* and a status of *"public"*.
 | |
| 
 | |
| To handle both of these situations, Django has a consistent way of processing
 | |
| ``filter()`` and ``exclude()`` calls. Everything inside a single ``filter()``
 | |
| call is applied simultaneously to filter out items matching all those
 | |
| requirements. Successive ``filter()`` calls further restrict the set of
 | |
| objects, but for multi-valued relations, they apply to any object linked to
 | |
| the primary model, not necessarily those objects that were selected by an
 | |
| earlier ``filter()`` call.
 | |
| 
 | |
| That may sound a bit confusing, so hopefully an example will clarify. To
 | |
| select all blogs that contain entries with both *"Lennon"* in the headline
 | |
| and that were published in 2008 (the same entry satisfying both conditions),
 | |
| we would write::
 | |
| 
 | |
|     Blog.objects.filter(entry__headline__contains='Lennon',
 | |
|             entry__pub_date__year=2008)
 | |
| 
 | |
| To select all blogs that contain an entry with *"Lennon"* in the headline
 | |
| **as well as** an entry that was published in 2008, we would write::
 | |
| 
 | |
|     Blog.objects.filter(entry__headline__contains='Lennon').filter(
 | |
|             entry__pub_date__year=2008)
 | |
| 
 | |
| In this second example, the first filter restricted the queryset to all those
 | |
| blogs linked to that particular type of entry. The second filter restricted
 | |
| the set of blogs *further* to those that are also linked to the second type of
 | |
| entry. The entries select by the second filter may or may not be the same as
 | |
| the entries in the first filter. We are filtering the ``Blog`` items with each
 | |
| filter statement, not the ``Entry`` items.
 | |
| 
 | |
| All of this behavior also applies to ``exclude()``: all the conditions in a
 | |
| single ``exclude()`` statement apply to a single instance (if those conditions
 | |
| are talking about the same multi-valued relation). Conditions in subsequent
 | |
| ``filter()`` or ``exclude()`` calls that refer to the same relation may end up
 | |
| filtering on different linked objects.
 | |
| 
 | |
| .. _query-expressions:
 | |
| 
 | |
| Filters can reference fields on the model
 | |
| -----------------------------------------
 | |
| 
 | |
| In the examples given so far, we have constructed filters that compare
 | |
| the value of a model field with a constant. But what if you want to compare
 | |
| the value of a model field with another field on the same model?
 | |
| 
 | |
| Django provides the ``F()`` object to allow such comparisons. Instances
 | |
| of ``F()`` act as a reference to a model field within a query. These
 | |
| references can then be used in query filters to compare the values of two
 | |
| different fields on the same model instance.
 | |
| 
 | |
| For example, to find a list of all blog entries that have had more comments
 | |
| than pingbacks, we construct an ``F()`` object to reference the pingback count,
 | |
| and use that ``F()`` object in the query::
 | |
| 
 | |
|     >>> from django.db.models import F
 | |
|     >>> Entry.objects.filter(n_comments__gt=F('n_pingbacks'))
 | |
| 
 | |
| Django supports the use of addition, subtraction, multiplication,
 | |
| division and modulo arithmetic with ``F()`` objects, both with constants
 | |
| and with other ``F()`` objects. To find all the blog entries with more than
 | |
| *twice* as many comments as pingbacks, we modify the query::
 | |
| 
 | |
|     >>> Entry.objects.filter(n_comments__gt=F('n_pingbacks') * 2)
 | |
| 
 | |
| To find all the entries where the rating of the entry is less than the
 | |
| sum of the pingback count and comment count, we would issue the
 | |
| query::
 | |
| 
 | |
|     >>> Entry.objects.filter(rating__lt=F('n_comments') + F('n_pingbacks'))
 | |
| 
 | |
| You can also use the double underscore notation to span relationships in
 | |
| an ``F()`` object. An ``F()`` object with a double underscore will introduce
 | |
| any joins needed to access the related object. For example, to retrieve all
 | |
| the entries where the author's name is the same as the blog name, we could
 | |
| issue the query::
 | |
| 
 | |
|     >>> Entry.objects.filter(authors__name=F('blog__name'))
 | |
| 
 | |
| .. versionadded:: 1.3
 | |
| 
 | |
| For date and date/time fields, you can add or subtract a ``datetime.timedelta``
 | |
| object.  The following would return all entries that were modified more than 3 days
 | |
| after they were published::
 | |
| 
 | |
|     >>> from datetime import timedelta
 | |
|     >>> Entry.objects.filter(mod_date__gt=F('pub_date') + timedelta(days=3))
 | |
| 
 | |
| The pk lookup shortcut
 | |
| ----------------------
 | |
| 
 | |
| For convenience, Django provides a ``pk`` lookup shortcut, which stands for
 | |
| "primary key".
 | |
| 
 | |
| In the example ``Blog`` model, the primary key is the ``id`` field, so these
 | |
| three statements are equivalent::
 | |
| 
 | |
|     >>> Blog.objects.get(id__exact=14) # Explicit form
 | |
|     >>> Blog.objects.get(id=14) # __exact is implied
 | |
|     >>> Blog.objects.get(pk=14) # pk implies id__exact
 | |
| 
 | |
| The use of ``pk`` isn't limited to ``__exact`` queries -- any query term
 | |
| can be combined with ``pk`` to perform a query on the primary key of a model::
 | |
| 
 | |
|     # Get blogs entries with id 1, 4 and 7
 | |
|     >>> Blog.objects.filter(pk__in=[1,4,7])
 | |
| 
 | |
|     # Get all blog entries with id > 14
 | |
|     >>> Blog.objects.filter(pk__gt=14)
 | |
| 
 | |
| ``pk`` lookups also work across joins. For example, these three statements are
 | |
| equivalent::
 | |
| 
 | |
|     >>> Entry.objects.filter(blog__id__exact=3) # Explicit form
 | |
|     >>> Entry.objects.filter(blog__id=3)        # __exact is implied
 | |
|     >>> Entry.objects.filter(blog__pk=3)        # __pk implies __id__exact
 | |
| 
 | |
| Escaping percent signs and underscores in LIKE statements
 | |
| ---------------------------------------------------------
 | |
| 
 | |
| The field lookups that equate to ``LIKE`` SQL statements (``iexact``,
 | |
| ``contains``, ``icontains``, ``startswith``, ``istartswith``, ``endswith``
 | |
| and ``iendswith``) will automatically escape the two special characters used in
 | |
| ``LIKE`` statements -- the percent sign and the underscore. (In a ``LIKE``
 | |
| statement, the percent sign signifies a multiple-character wildcard and the
 | |
| underscore signifies a single-character wildcard.)
 | |
| 
 | |
| This means things should work intuitively, so the abstraction doesn't leak.
 | |
| For example, to retrieve all the entries that contain a percent sign, just use
 | |
| the percent sign as any other character::
 | |
| 
 | |
|     >>> Entry.objects.filter(headline__contains='%')
 | |
| 
 | |
| Django takes care of the quoting for you; the resulting SQL will look something
 | |
| like this:
 | |
| 
 | |
| .. code-block:: sql
 | |
| 
 | |
|     SELECT ... WHERE headline LIKE '%\%%';
 | |
| 
 | |
| Same goes for underscores. Both percentage signs and underscores are handled
 | |
| for you transparently.
 | |
| 
 | |
| .. _caching-and-querysets:
 | |
| 
 | |
| Caching and QuerySets
 | |
| ---------------------
 | |
| 
 | |
| Each ``QuerySet`` contains a cache, to minimize database access. It's important
 | |
| to understand how it works, in order to write the most efficient code.
 | |
| 
 | |
| In a newly created ``QuerySet``, the cache is empty. The first time a
 | |
| ``QuerySet`` is evaluated -- and, hence, a database query happens -- Django
 | |
| saves the query results in the ``QuerySet``'s cache and returns the results
 | |
| that have been explicitly requested (e.g., the next element, if the
 | |
| ``QuerySet`` is being iterated over). Subsequent evaluations of the
 | |
| ``QuerySet`` reuse the cached results.
 | |
| 
 | |
| Keep this caching behavior in mind, because it may bite you if you don't use
 | |
| your ``QuerySet``\s correctly. For example, the following will create two
 | |
| ``QuerySet``\s, evaluate them, and throw them away::
 | |
| 
 | |
|     >>> print [e.headline for e in Entry.objects.all()]
 | |
|     >>> print [e.pub_date for e in Entry.objects.all()]
 | |
| 
 | |
| That means the same database query will be executed twice, effectively doubling
 | |
| your database load. Also, there's a possibility the two lists may not include
 | |
| the same database records, because an ``Entry`` may have been added or deleted
 | |
| in the split second between the two requests.
 | |
| 
 | |
| To avoid this problem, simply save the ``QuerySet`` and reuse it::
 | |
| 
 | |
|     >>> queryset = Entry.objects.all()
 | |
|     >>> print [p.headline for p in queryset] # Evaluate the query set.
 | |
|     >>> print [p.pub_date for p in queryset] # Re-use the cache from the evaluation.
 | |
| 
 | |
| .. _complex-lookups-with-q:
 | |
| 
 | |
| Complex lookups with Q objects
 | |
| ==============================
 | |
| 
 | |
| Keyword argument queries -- in ``filter()``, etc. -- are "AND"ed together. If
 | |
| you need to execute more complex queries (for example, queries with ``OR``
 | |
| statements), you can use ``Q`` objects.
 | |
| 
 | |
| A ``Q`` object (``django.db.models.Q``) is an object used to encapsulate a
 | |
| collection of keyword arguments. These keyword arguments are specified as in
 | |
| "Field lookups" above.
 | |
| 
 | |
| For example, this ``Q`` object encapsulates a single ``LIKE`` query::
 | |
| 
 | |
|     from django.db.models import Q
 | |
|     Q(question__startswith='What')
 | |
| 
 | |
| ``Q`` objects can be combined using the ``&`` and ``|`` operators. When an
 | |
| operator is used on two ``Q`` objects, it yields a new ``Q`` object.
 | |
| 
 | |
| For example, this statement yields a single ``Q`` object that represents the
 | |
| "OR" of two ``"question__startswith"`` queries::
 | |
| 
 | |
|     Q(question__startswith='Who') | Q(question__startswith='What')
 | |
| 
 | |
| This is equivalent to the following SQL ``WHERE`` clause::
 | |
| 
 | |
|     WHERE question LIKE 'Who%' OR question LIKE 'What%'
 | |
| 
 | |
| You can compose statements of arbitrary complexity by combining ``Q`` objects
 | |
| with the ``&`` and ``|`` operators and use parenthetical grouping. Also, ``Q``
 | |
| objects can be negated using the ``~`` operator, allowing for combined lookups
 | |
| that combine both a normal query and a negated (``NOT``) query::
 | |
| 
 | |
|     Q(question__startswith='Who') | ~Q(pub_date__year=2005)
 | |
| 
 | |
| Each lookup function that takes keyword-arguments (e.g. ``filter()``,
 | |
| ``exclude()``, ``get()``) can also be passed one or more ``Q`` objects as
 | |
| positional (not-named) arguments. If you provide multiple ``Q`` object
 | |
| arguments to a lookup function, the arguments will be "AND"ed together. For
 | |
| example::
 | |
| 
 | |
|     Poll.objects.get(
 | |
|         Q(question__startswith='Who'),
 | |
|         Q(pub_date=date(2005, 5, 2)) | Q(pub_date=date(2005, 5, 6))
 | |
|     )
 | |
| 
 | |
| ... roughly translates into the SQL::
 | |
| 
 | |
|     SELECT * from polls WHERE question LIKE 'Who%'
 | |
|         AND (pub_date = '2005-05-02' OR pub_date = '2005-05-06')
 | |
| 
 | |
| Lookup functions can mix the use of ``Q`` objects and keyword arguments. All
 | |
| arguments provided to a lookup function (be they keyword arguments or ``Q``
 | |
| objects) are "AND"ed together. However, if a ``Q`` object is provided, it must
 | |
| precede the definition of any keyword arguments. For example::
 | |
| 
 | |
|     Poll.objects.get(
 | |
|         Q(pub_date=date(2005, 5, 2)) | Q(pub_date=date(2005, 5, 6)),
 | |
|         question__startswith='Who')
 | |
| 
 | |
| ... would be a valid query, equivalent to the previous example; but::
 | |
| 
 | |
|     # INVALID QUERY
 | |
|     Poll.objects.get(
 | |
|         question__startswith='Who',
 | |
|         Q(pub_date=date(2005, 5, 2)) | Q(pub_date=date(2005, 5, 6)))
 | |
| 
 | |
| ... would not be valid.
 | |
| 
 | |
| .. seealso::
 | |
| 
 | |
|     The `OR lookups examples`_ in the Django unit tests show some possible uses
 | |
|     of ``Q``.
 | |
| 
 | |
|     .. _OR lookups examples: http://code.djangoproject.com/browser/django/trunk/tests/modeltests/or_lookups/tests.py
 | |
| 
 | |
| Comparing objects
 | |
| =================
 | |
| 
 | |
| To compare two model instances, just use the standard Python comparison operator,
 | |
| the double equals sign: ``==``. Behind the scenes, that compares the primary
 | |
| key values of two models.
 | |
| 
 | |
| Using the ``Entry`` example above, the following two statements are equivalent::
 | |
| 
 | |
|     >>> some_entry == other_entry
 | |
|     >>> some_entry.id == other_entry.id
 | |
| 
 | |
| If a model's primary key isn't called ``id``, no problem. Comparisons will
 | |
| always use the primary key, whatever it's called. For example, if a model's
 | |
| primary key field is called ``name``, these two statements are equivalent::
 | |
| 
 | |
|     >>> some_obj == other_obj
 | |
|     >>> some_obj.name == other_obj.name
 | |
| 
 | |
| .. _topics-db-queries-delete:
 | |
| 
 | |
| Deleting objects
 | |
| ================
 | |
| 
 | |
| The delete method, conveniently, is named ``delete()``. This method immediately
 | |
| deletes the object and has no return value. Example::
 | |
| 
 | |
|     e.delete()
 | |
| 
 | |
| You can also delete objects in bulk. Every ``QuerySet`` has a ``delete()``
 | |
| method, which deletes all members of that ``QuerySet``.
 | |
| 
 | |
| For example, this deletes all ``Entry`` objects with a ``pub_date`` year of
 | |
| 2005::
 | |
| 
 | |
|     Entry.objects.filter(pub_date__year=2005).delete()
 | |
| 
 | |
| Keep in mind that this will, whenever possible, be executed purely in
 | |
| SQL, and so the ``delete()`` methods of individual object instances
 | |
| will not necessarily be called during the process. If you've provided
 | |
| a custom ``delete()`` method on a model class and want to ensure that
 | |
| it is called, you will need to "manually" delete instances of that
 | |
| model (e.g., by iterating over a ``QuerySet`` and calling ``delete()``
 | |
| on each object individually) rather than using the bulk ``delete()``
 | |
| method of a ``QuerySet``.
 | |
| 
 | |
| When Django deletes an object, by default it emulates the behavior of the SQL
 | |
| constraint ``ON DELETE CASCADE`` -- in other words, any objects which had
 | |
| foreign keys pointing at the object to be deleted will be deleted along with
 | |
| it. For example::
 | |
| 
 | |
|     b = Blog.objects.get(pk=1)
 | |
|     # This will delete the Blog and all of its Entry objects.
 | |
|     b.delete()
 | |
| 
 | |
| .. versionadded:: 1.3
 | |
|     This cascade behavior is customizable via the
 | |
|     :attr:`~django.db.models.ForeignKey.on_delete` argument to the
 | |
|     :class:`~django.db.models.ForeignKey`.
 | |
| 
 | |
| Note that ``delete()`` is the only ``QuerySet`` method that is not exposed on a
 | |
| ``Manager`` itself. This is a safety mechanism to prevent you from accidentally
 | |
| requesting ``Entry.objects.delete()``, and deleting *all* the entries. If you
 | |
| *do* want to delete all the objects, then you have to explicitly request a
 | |
| complete query set::
 | |
| 
 | |
|     Entry.objects.all().delete()
 | |
| 
 | |
| .. _topics-db-queries-update:
 | |
| 
 | |
| Updating multiple objects at once
 | |
| =================================
 | |
| 
 | |
| Sometimes you want to set a field to a particular value for all the objects in
 | |
| a ``QuerySet``. You can do this with the ``update()`` method. For example::
 | |
| 
 | |
|     # Update all the headlines with pub_date in 2007.
 | |
|     Entry.objects.filter(pub_date__year=2007).update(headline='Everything is the same')
 | |
| 
 | |
| You can only set non-relation fields and ``ForeignKey`` fields using this
 | |
| method. To update a non-relation field, provide the new value as a constant.
 | |
| To update ``ForeignKey`` fields, set the new value to be the new model
 | |
| instance you want to point to. For example::
 | |
| 
 | |
|     >>> b = Blog.objects.get(pk=1)
 | |
| 
 | |
|     # Change every Entry so that it belongs to this Blog.
 | |
|     >>> Entry.objects.all().update(blog=b)
 | |
| 
 | |
| The ``update()`` method is applied instantly and returns the number of rows
 | |
| affected by the query. The only restriction on the ``QuerySet`` that is
 | |
| updated is that it can only access one database table, the model's main
 | |
| table. You can filter based on related fields, but you can only update columns
 | |
| in the model's main table. Example::
 | |
| 
 | |
|     >>> b = Blog.objects.get(pk=1)
 | |
| 
 | |
|     # Update all the headlines belonging to this Blog.
 | |
|     >>> Entry.objects.select_related().filter(blog=b).update(headline='Everything is the same')
 | |
| 
 | |
| Be aware that the ``update()`` method is converted directly to an SQL
 | |
| statement. It is a bulk operation for direct updates. It doesn't run any
 | |
| ``save()`` methods on your models, or emit the ``pre_save`` or ``post_save``
 | |
| signals (which are a consequence of calling ``save()``). If you want to save
 | |
| every item in a ``QuerySet`` and make sure that the ``save()`` method is
 | |
| called on each instance, you don't need any special function to handle that.
 | |
| Just loop over them and call ``save()``::
 | |
| 
 | |
|     for item in my_queryset:
 | |
|         item.save()
 | |
| 
 | |
| Calls to update can also use :ref:`F() objects <query-expressions>` to update
 | |
| one field based on the value of another field in the model. This is especially
 | |
| useful for incrementing counters based upon their current value. For example, to
 | |
| increment the pingback count for every entry in the blog::
 | |
| 
 | |
|     >>> Entry.objects.all().update(n_pingbacks=F('n_pingbacks') + 1)
 | |
| 
 | |
| However, unlike ``F()`` objects in filter and exclude clauses, you can't
 | |
| introduce joins when you use ``F()`` objects in an update -- you can only
 | |
| reference fields local to the model being updated. If you attempt to introduce
 | |
| a join with an ``F()`` object, a ``FieldError`` will be raised::
 | |
| 
 | |
|     # THIS WILL RAISE A FieldError
 | |
|     >>> Entry.objects.update(headline=F('blog__name'))
 | |
| 
 | |
| .. _topics-db-queries-related:
 | |
| 
 | |
| Related objects
 | |
| ===============
 | |
| 
 | |
| When you define a relationship in a model (i.e., a ``ForeignKey``,
 | |
| ``OneToOneField``, or ``ManyToManyField``), instances of that model will have
 | |
| a convenient API to access the related object(s).
 | |
| 
 | |
| Using the models at the top of this page, for example, an ``Entry`` object ``e``
 | |
| can get its associated ``Blog`` object by accessing the ``blog`` attribute:
 | |
| ``e.blog``.
 | |
| 
 | |
| (Behind the scenes, this functionality is implemented by Python descriptors_.
 | |
| This shouldn't really matter to you, but we point it out here for the curious.)
 | |
| 
 | |
| Django also creates API accessors for the "other" side of the relationship --
 | |
| the link from the related model to the model that defines the relationship.
 | |
| For example, a ``Blog`` object ``b`` has access to a list of all related
 | |
| ``Entry`` objects via the ``entry_set`` attribute: ``b.entry_set.all()``.
 | |
| 
 | |
| All examples in this section use the sample ``Blog``, ``Author`` and ``Entry``
 | |
| models defined at the top of this page.
 | |
| 
 | |
| .. _descriptors: http://users.rcn.com/python/download/Descriptor.htm
 | |
| 
 | |
| One-to-many relationships
 | |
| -------------------------
 | |
| 
 | |
| Forward
 | |
| ~~~~~~~
 | |
| 
 | |
| If a model has a ``ForeignKey``, instances of that model will have access to
 | |
| the related (foreign) object via a simple attribute of the model.
 | |
| 
 | |
| Example::
 | |
| 
 | |
|     >>> e = Entry.objects.get(id=2)
 | |
|     >>> e.blog # Returns the related Blog object.
 | |
| 
 | |
| You can get and set via a foreign-key attribute. As you may expect, changes to
 | |
| the foreign key aren't saved to the database until you call ``save()``.
 | |
| Example::
 | |
| 
 | |
|     >>> e = Entry.objects.get(id=2)
 | |
|     >>> e.blog = some_blog
 | |
|     >>> e.save()
 | |
| 
 | |
| If a ``ForeignKey`` field has ``null=True`` set (i.e., it allows ``NULL``
 | |
| values), you can assign ``None`` to it. Example::
 | |
| 
 | |
|     >>> e = Entry.objects.get(id=2)
 | |
|     >>> e.blog = None
 | |
|     >>> e.save() # "UPDATE blog_entry SET blog_id = NULL ...;"
 | |
| 
 | |
| Forward access to one-to-many relationships is cached the first time the
 | |
| related object is accessed. Subsequent accesses to the foreign key on the same
 | |
| object instance are cached. Example::
 | |
| 
 | |
|     >>> e = Entry.objects.get(id=2)
 | |
|     >>> print e.blog  # Hits the database to retrieve the associated Blog.
 | |
|     >>> print e.blog  # Doesn't hit the database; uses cached version.
 | |
| 
 | |
| Note that the ``select_related()`` ``QuerySet`` method recursively prepopulates
 | |
| the cache of all one-to-many relationships ahead of time. Example::
 | |
| 
 | |
|     >>> e = Entry.objects.select_related().get(id=2)
 | |
|     >>> print e.blog  # Doesn't hit the database; uses cached version.
 | |
|     >>> print e.blog  # Doesn't hit the database; uses cached version.
 | |
| 
 | |
| .. _backwards-related-objects:
 | |
| 
 | |
| Following relationships "backward"
 | |
| ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
 | |
| 
 | |
| If a model has a ``ForeignKey``, instances of the foreign-key model will have
 | |
| access to a ``Manager`` that returns all instances of the first model. By
 | |
| default, this ``Manager`` is named ``FOO_set``, where ``FOO`` is the source
 | |
| model name, lowercased. This ``Manager`` returns ``QuerySets``, which can be
 | |
| filtered and manipulated as described in the "Retrieving objects" section
 | |
| above.
 | |
| 
 | |
| Example::
 | |
| 
 | |
|     >>> b = Blog.objects.get(id=1)
 | |
|     >>> b.entry_set.all() # Returns all Entry objects related to Blog.
 | |
| 
 | |
|     # b.entry_set is a Manager that returns QuerySets.
 | |
|     >>> b.entry_set.filter(headline__contains='Lennon')
 | |
|     >>> b.entry_set.count()
 | |
| 
 | |
| You can override the ``FOO_set`` name by setting the ``related_name``
 | |
| parameter in the ``ForeignKey()`` definition. For example, if the ``Entry``
 | |
| model was altered to ``blog = ForeignKey(Blog, related_name='entries')``, the
 | |
| above example code would look like this::
 | |
| 
 | |
|     >>> b = Blog.objects.get(id=1)
 | |
|     >>> b.entries.all() # Returns all Entry objects related to Blog.
 | |
| 
 | |
|     # b.entries is a Manager that returns QuerySets.
 | |
|     >>> b.entries.filter(headline__contains='Lennon')
 | |
|     >>> b.entries.count()
 | |
| 
 | |
| You cannot access a reverse ``ForeignKey`` ``Manager`` from the class; it must
 | |
| be accessed from an instance::
 | |
| 
 | |
|     >>> Blog.entry_set
 | |
|     Traceback:
 | |
|         ...
 | |
|     AttributeError: "Manager must be accessed via instance".
 | |
| 
 | |
| In addition to the ``QuerySet`` methods defined in "Retrieving objects" above,
 | |
| the ``ForeignKey`` ``Manager`` has additional methods used to handle the set of
 | |
| related objects. A synopsis of each is below, and complete details can be found
 | |
| in the :doc:`related objects reference </ref/models/relations>`.
 | |
| 
 | |
| ``add(obj1, obj2, ...)``
 | |
|     Adds the specified model objects to the related object set.
 | |
| 
 | |
| ``create(**kwargs)``
 | |
|     Creates a new object, saves it and puts it in the related object set.
 | |
|     Returns the newly created object.
 | |
| 
 | |
| ``remove(obj1, obj2, ...)``
 | |
|     Removes the specified model objects from the related object set.
 | |
| 
 | |
| ``clear()``
 | |
|     Removes all objects from the related object set.
 | |
| 
 | |
| To assign the members of a related set in one fell swoop, just assign to it
 | |
| from any iterable object. The iterable can contain object instances, or just
 | |
| a list of primary key values. For example::
 | |
| 
 | |
|     b = Blog.objects.get(id=1)
 | |
|     b.entry_set = [e1, e2]
 | |
| 
 | |
| In this example, ``e1`` and ``e2`` can be full Entry instances, or integer
 | |
| primary key values.
 | |
| 
 | |
| If the ``clear()`` method is available, any pre-existing objects will be
 | |
| removed from the ``entry_set`` before all objects in the iterable (in this
 | |
| case, a list) are added to the set. If the ``clear()`` method is *not*
 | |
| available, all objects in the iterable will be added without removing any
 | |
| existing elements.
 | |
| 
 | |
| Each "reverse" operation described in this section has an immediate effect on
 | |
| the database. Every addition, creation and deletion is immediately and
 | |
| automatically saved to the database.
 | |
| 
 | |
| .. _m2m-reverse-relationships:
 | |
| 
 | |
| Many-to-many relationships
 | |
| --------------------------
 | |
| 
 | |
| Both ends of a many-to-many relationship get automatic API access to the other
 | |
| end. The API works just as a "backward" one-to-many relationship, above.
 | |
| 
 | |
| The only difference is in the attribute naming: The model that defines the
 | |
| ``ManyToManyField`` uses the attribute name of that field itself, whereas the
 | |
| "reverse" model uses the lowercased model name of the original model, plus
 | |
| ``'_set'`` (just like reverse one-to-many relationships).
 | |
| 
 | |
| An example makes this easier to understand::
 | |
| 
 | |
|     e = Entry.objects.get(id=3)
 | |
|     e.authors.all() # Returns all Author objects for this Entry.
 | |
|     e.authors.count()
 | |
|     e.authors.filter(name__contains='John')
 | |
| 
 | |
|     a = Author.objects.get(id=5)
 | |
|     a.entry_set.all() # Returns all Entry objects for this Author.
 | |
| 
 | |
| Like ``ForeignKey``, ``ManyToManyField`` can specify ``related_name``. In the
 | |
| above example, if the ``ManyToManyField`` in ``Entry`` had specified
 | |
| ``related_name='entries'``, then each ``Author`` instance would have an
 | |
| ``entries`` attribute instead of ``entry_set``.
 | |
| 
 | |
| One-to-one relationships
 | |
| ------------------------
 | |
| 
 | |
| One-to-one relationships are very similar to many-to-one relationships. If you
 | |
| define a :class:`~django.db.models.OneToOneField` on your model, instances of
 | |
| that model will have access to the related object via a simple attribute of the
 | |
| model.
 | |
| 
 | |
| For example::
 | |
| 
 | |
|     class EntryDetail(models.Model):
 | |
|         entry = models.OneToOneField(Entry)
 | |
|         details = models.TextField()
 | |
| 
 | |
|     ed = EntryDetail.objects.get(id=2)
 | |
|     ed.entry # Returns the related Entry object.
 | |
| 
 | |
| The difference comes in "reverse" queries. The related model in a one-to-one
 | |
| relationship also has access to a :class:`~django.db.models.Manager` object, but
 | |
| that :class:`~django.db.models.Manager` represents a single object, rather than
 | |
| a collection of objects::
 | |
| 
 | |
|     e = Entry.objects.get(id=2)
 | |
|     e.entrydetail # returns the related EntryDetail object
 | |
| 
 | |
| If no object has been assigned to this relationship, Django will raise
 | |
| a ``DoesNotExist`` exception.
 | |
| 
 | |
| Instances can be assigned to the reverse relationship in the same way as
 | |
| you would assign the forward relationship::
 | |
| 
 | |
|     e.entrydetail = ed
 | |
| 
 | |
| How are the backward relationships possible?
 | |
| --------------------------------------------
 | |
| 
 | |
| Other object-relational mappers require you to define relationships on both
 | |
| sides. The Django developers believe this is a violation of the DRY (Don't
 | |
| Repeat Yourself) principle, so Django only requires you to define the
 | |
| relationship on one end.
 | |
| 
 | |
| But how is this possible, given that a model class doesn't know which other
 | |
| model classes are related to it until those other model classes are loaded?
 | |
| 
 | |
| The answer lies in the :setting:`INSTALLED_APPS` setting. The first time any model is
 | |
| loaded, Django iterates over every model in :setting:`INSTALLED_APPS` and creates the
 | |
| backward relationships in memory as needed. Essentially, one of the functions
 | |
| of :setting:`INSTALLED_APPS` is to tell Django the entire model domain.
 | |
| 
 | |
| Queries over related objects
 | |
| ----------------------------
 | |
| 
 | |
| Queries involving related objects follow the same rules as queries involving
 | |
| normal value fields. When specifying the value for a query to match, you may
 | |
| use either an object instance itself, or the primary key value for the object.
 | |
| 
 | |
| For example, if you have a Blog object ``b`` with ``id=5``, the following
 | |
| three queries would be identical::
 | |
| 
 | |
|     Entry.objects.filter(blog=b) # Query using object instance
 | |
|     Entry.objects.filter(blog=b.id) # Query using id from instance
 | |
|     Entry.objects.filter(blog=5) # Query using id directly
 | |
| 
 | |
| Falling back to raw SQL
 | |
| =======================
 | |
| 
 | |
| If you find yourself needing to write an SQL query that is too complex for
 | |
| Django's database-mapper to handle, you can fall back on writing SQL by hand.
 | |
| Django has a couple of options for writing raw SQL queries; see
 | |
| :doc:`/topics/db/sql`.
 | |
| 
 | |
| Finally, it's important to note that the Django database layer is merely an
 | |
| interface to your database. You can access your database via other tools,
 | |
| programming languages or database frameworks; there's nothing Django-specific
 | |
| about your database.
 |