mirror of
				https://github.com/django/django.git
				synced 2025-10-28 08:06:09 +00:00 
			
		
		
		
	
		
			
				
	
	
		
			824 lines
		
	
	
		
			35 KiB
		
	
	
	
		
			Plaintext
		
	
	
	
	
	
			
		
		
	
	
			824 lines
		
	
	
		
			35 KiB
		
	
	
	
		
			Plaintext
		
	
	
	
	
	
| ==========
 | |
| Migrations
 | |
| ==========
 | |
| 
 | |
| .. module:: django.db.migrations
 | |
|    :synopsis: Schema migration support for Django models
 | |
| 
 | |
| .. versionadded:: 1.7
 | |
| 
 | |
| Migrations are Django's way of propagating changes you make to your models
 | |
| (adding a field, deleting a model, etc.) into your database schema. They're
 | |
| designed to be mostly automatic, but you'll need to know when to make
 | |
| migrations, when to run them, and the common problems you might run into.
 | |
| 
 | |
| A Brief History
 | |
| ---------------
 | |
| 
 | |
| Prior to version 1.7, Django only supported adding new models to the
 | |
| database; it was not possible to alter or remove existing models via the
 | |
| ``syncdb`` command (the predecessor to :djadmin:`migrate`).
 | |
| 
 | |
| Third-party tools, most notably `South <http://south.aeracode.org>`_,
 | |
| provided support for these additional types of change, but it was considered
 | |
| important enough that support was brought into core Django.
 | |
| 
 | |
| The Commands
 | |
| ------------
 | |
| 
 | |
| There are several commands which you will use to interact with migrations
 | |
| and Django's handling of database schema:
 | |
| 
 | |
| * :djadmin:`migrate`, which is responsible for applying migrations, as well as
 | |
|   unapplying and listing their status.
 | |
| 
 | |
| * :djadmin:`makemigrations`, which is responsible for creating new migrations
 | |
|   based on the changes you have made to your models.
 | |
| 
 | |
| * :djadmin:`sqlmigrate`, which displays the SQL statements for a migration.
 | |
| 
 | |
| It's worth noting that migrations are created and run on a per-app basis.
 | |
| In particular, it's possible to have apps that *do not use migrations* (these
 | |
| are referred to as "unmigrated" apps) - these apps will instead mimic the
 | |
| legacy behavior of just adding new models.
 | |
| 
 | |
| You should think of migrations as a version control system for your database
 | |
| schema. ``makemigrations`` is responsible for packaging up your model changes
 | |
| into individual migration files - analogous to commits - and ``migrate`` is
 | |
| responsible for applying those to your database.
 | |
| 
 | |
| The migration files for each app live in a "migrations" directory inside
 | |
| of that app, and are designed to be committed to, and distributed as part
 | |
| of, its codebase. You should be making them once on your development machine
 | |
| and then running the same migrations on your colleagues' machines, your
 | |
| staging machines, and eventually your production machines.
 | |
| 
 | |
| .. note::
 | |
|     It is possible to override the name of the package which contains the
 | |
|     migrations on a per-app basis by modifying the :setting:`MIGRATION_MODULES`
 | |
|     setting.
 | |
| 
 | |
| Migrations will run the same way on the same dataset and produce consistent
 | |
| results, meaning that what you see in development and staging is, under the
 | |
| same circumstances, exactly what will happen in production.
 | |
| 
 | |
| Django will make migrations for any change to your models or fields - even
 | |
| options that don't affect the database - as the only way it can reconstruct
 | |
| a field correctly is to have all the changes in the history, and you might
 | |
| need those options in some data migrations later on (for example, if you've
 | |
| set custom validators).
 | |
| 
 | |
| Backend Support
 | |
| ---------------
 | |
| 
 | |
| Migrations are supported on all backends that Django ships with, as well
 | |
| as any third-party backends if they have programmed in support for schema
 | |
| alteration (done via the :doc:`SchemaEditor </ref/schema-editor>` class).
 | |
| 
 | |
| However, some databases are more capable than others when it comes to
 | |
| schema migrations; some of the caveats are covered below.
 | |
| 
 | |
| PostgreSQL
 | |
| ~~~~~~~~~~
 | |
| 
 | |
| PostgreSQL is the most capable of all the databases here in terms of schema
 | |
| support; the only caveat is that adding columns with default values will
 | |
| cause a full rewrite of the table, for a time proportional to its size.
 | |
| 
 | |
| For this reason, it's recommended you always create new columns with
 | |
| ``null=True``, as this way they will be added immediately.
 | |
| 
 | |
| MySQL
 | |
| ~~~~~
 | |
| 
 | |
| MySQL lacks support for transactions around schema alteration operations,
 | |
| meaning that if a migration fails to apply you will have to manually unpick
 | |
| the changes in order to try again (it's impossible to roll back to an
 | |
| earlier point).
 | |
| 
 | |
| In addition, MySQL will fully rewrite tables for almost every schema operation
 | |
| and generally takes a time proportional to the number of rows in the table to
 | |
| add or remove columns. On slower hardware this can be worse than a minute per
 | |
| million rows - adding a few columns to a table with just a few million rows
 | |
| could lock your site up for over ten minutes.
 | |
| 
 | |
| Finally, MySQL has reasonably small limits on name lengths for columns, tables
 | |
| and indexes, as well as a limit on the combined size of all columns an index
 | |
| covers. This means that indexes that are possible on other backends will
 | |
| fail to be created under MySQL.
 | |
| 
 | |
| SQLite
 | |
| ~~~~~~
 | |
| 
 | |
| SQLite has very little built-in schema alteration support, and so Django
 | |
| attempts to emulate it by:
 | |
| 
 | |
| * Creating a new table with the new schema
 | |
| * Copying the data across
 | |
| * Dropping the old table
 | |
| * Renaming the new table to match the original name
 | |
| 
 | |
| This process generally works well, but it can be slow and occasionally
 | |
| buggy. It is not recommended that you run and migrate SQLite in a
 | |
| production environment unless you are very aware of the risks and
 | |
| its limitations; the support Django ships with is designed to allow
 | |
| developers to use SQLite on their local machines to develop less complex
 | |
| Django projects without the need for a full database.
 | |
| 
 | |
| Workflow
 | |
| --------
 | |
| 
 | |
| Working with migrations is simple. Make changes to your models - say, add
 | |
| a field and remove a model - and then run :djadmin:`makemigrations`::
 | |
| 
 | |
|     $ python manage.py makemigrations
 | |
|     Migrations for 'books':
 | |
|       0003_auto.py:
 | |
|         - Alter field author on book
 | |
| 
 | |
| Your models will be scanned and compared to the versions currently
 | |
| contained in your migration files, and then a new set of migrations
 | |
| will be written out. Make sure to read the output to see what
 | |
| ``makemigrations`` thinks you have changed - it's not perfect, and for
 | |
| complex changes it might not be detecting what you expect.
 | |
| 
 | |
| Once you have your new migration files, you should apply them to your
 | |
| database to make sure they work as expected::
 | |
| 
 | |
|     $ python manage.py migrate
 | |
|     Operations to perform:
 | |
|       Synchronize unmigrated apps: sessions, admin, messages, auth, staticfiles, contenttypes
 | |
|       Apply all migrations: books
 | |
|     Synchronizing apps without migrations:
 | |
|       Creating tables...
 | |
|       Installing custom SQL...
 | |
|       Installing indexes...
 | |
|     Installed 0 object(s) from 0 fixture(s)
 | |
|     Running migrations:
 | |
|       Applying books.0003_auto... OK
 | |
| 
 | |
| The command runs in two stages; first, it synchronizes unmigrated apps
 | |
| (performing the same functionality that ``syncdb`` used to provide), and
 | |
| then it runs any migrations that have not yet been applied.
 | |
| 
 | |
| Once the migration is applied, commit the migration and the models change
 | |
| to your version control system as a single commit - that way, when other
 | |
| developers (or your production servers) check out the code, they'll
 | |
| get both the changes to your models and the accompanying migration at the
 | |
| same time.
 | |
| 
 | |
| .. versionadded:: 1.8
 | |
| 
 | |
| If you want to give the migration(s) a meaningful name instead of a generated
 | |
| one, you can use the :djadminopt:`--name` option::
 | |
| 
 | |
|     $ python manage.py makemigrations --name changed_my_model your_app_label
 | |
| 
 | |
| Version control
 | |
| ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
 | |
| 
 | |
| Because migrations are stored in version control, you'll occasionally
 | |
| come across situations where you and another developer have both committed
 | |
| a migration to the same app at the same time, resulting in two migrations
 | |
| with the same number.
 | |
| 
 | |
| Don't worry - the numbers are just there for developers' reference, Django
 | |
| just cares that each migration has a different name. Migrations specify which
 | |
| other migrations they depend on - including earlier migrations in the same
 | |
| app - in the file, so it's possible to detect when there's two new migrations
 | |
| for the same app that aren't ordered.
 | |
| 
 | |
| When this happens, Django will prompt you and give you some options. If it
 | |
| thinks it's safe enough, it will offer to automatically linearize the two
 | |
| migrations for you. If not, you'll have to go in and modify the migrations
 | |
| yourself - don't worry, this isn't difficult, and is explained more in
 | |
| :ref:`migration-files` below.
 | |
| 
 | |
| Dependencies
 | |
| ------------
 | |
| 
 | |
| While migrations are per-app, the tables and relationships implied by
 | |
| your models are too complex to be created for just one app at a time. When
 | |
| you make a migration that requires something else to run - for example,
 | |
| you add a ``ForeignKey`` in your ``books`` app to your ``authors`` app - the
 | |
| resulting migration will contain a dependency on a migration in ``authors``.
 | |
| 
 | |
| This means that when you run the migrations, the ``authors`` migration runs
 | |
| first and creates the table the ``ForeignKey`` references, and then the migration
 | |
| that makes the ``ForeignKey`` column runs afterwards and creates the constraint.
 | |
| If this didn't happen, the migration would try to create the ``ForeignKey``
 | |
| column without the table it's referencing existing and your database would
 | |
| throw an error.
 | |
| 
 | |
| This dependency behavior affects most migration operations where you
 | |
| restrict to a single app. Restricting to a single app (either in
 | |
| ``makemigrations`` or ``migrate``) is a best-efforts promise, and not
 | |
| a guarantee; any other apps that need to be used to get dependencies correct
 | |
| will be.
 | |
| 
 | |
| .. _unmigrated-dependencies:
 | |
| 
 | |
| Be aware, however, that unmigrated apps cannot depend on migrated apps, by the
 | |
| very nature of not having migrations. This means that it is not generally
 | |
| possible to have an unmigrated app have a ``ForeignKey`` or ``ManyToManyField``
 | |
| to a migrated app; some cases may work, but it will eventually fail.
 | |
| 
 | |
| .. warning::
 | |
| 
 | |
|     Even if things appear to work with unmigrated apps depending on migrated
 | |
|     apps, Django may not generate all the necessary foreign key constraints!
 | |
| 
 | |
| This is particularly apparent if you use swappable models (e.g.
 | |
| ``AUTH_USER_MODEL``), as every app that uses swappable models will need
 | |
| to have migrations if you're unlucky. As time goes on, more and more
 | |
| third-party apps will get migrations, but in the meantime you can either
 | |
| give them migrations yourself (using :setting:`MIGRATION_MODULES` to
 | |
| store those modules outside of the app's own module if you wish), or
 | |
| keep the app with your user model unmigrated.
 | |
| 
 | |
| .. _migration-files:
 | |
| 
 | |
| Migration files
 | |
| ---------------
 | |
| 
 | |
| Migrations are stored as an on-disk format, referred to here as
 | |
| "migration files". These files are actually just normal Python files with
 | |
| an agreed-upon object layout, written in a declarative style.
 | |
| 
 | |
| A basic migration file looks like this::
 | |
| 
 | |
|     from django.db import migrations, models
 | |
| 
 | |
|     class Migration(migrations.Migration):
 | |
| 
 | |
|         dependencies = [("migrations", "0001_initial")]
 | |
| 
 | |
|         operations = [
 | |
|             migrations.DeleteModel("Tribble"),
 | |
|             migrations.AddField("Author", "rating", models.IntegerField(default=0)),
 | |
|         ]
 | |
| 
 | |
| What Django looks for when it loads a migration file (as a Python module) is
 | |
| a subclass of ``django.db.migrations.Migration`` called ``Migration``. It then
 | |
| inspects this object for four attributes, only two of which are used
 | |
| most of the time:
 | |
| 
 | |
| * ``dependencies``, a list of migrations this one depends on.
 | |
| * ``operations``, a list of ``Operation`` classes that define what this
 | |
|   migration does.
 | |
| 
 | |
| The operations are the key; they are a set of declarative instructions which
 | |
| tell Django what schema changes need to be made. Django scans them and
 | |
| builds an in-memory representation of all of the schema changes to all apps,
 | |
| and uses this to generate the SQL which makes the schema changes.
 | |
| 
 | |
| That in-memory structure is also used to work out what the differences are
 | |
| between your models and the current state of your migrations; Django runs
 | |
| through all the changes, in order, on an in-memory set of models to come
 | |
| up with the state of your models last time you ran ``makemigrations``. It
 | |
| then uses these models to compare against the ones in your ``models.py`` files
 | |
| to work out what you have changed.
 | |
| 
 | |
| You should rarely, if ever, need to edit migration files by hand, but
 | |
| it's entirely possible to write them manually if you need to. Some of the
 | |
| more complex operations are not autodetectable and are only available via
 | |
| a hand-written migration, so don't be scared about editing them if you have to.
 | |
| 
 | |
| Custom fields
 | |
| ~~~~~~~~~~~~~
 | |
| 
 | |
| You can't modify the number of positional arguments in an already migrated
 | |
| custom field without raising a ``TypeError``. The old migration will call the
 | |
| modified ``__init__`` method with the old signature. So if you need a new
 | |
| argument, please create a keyword argument and add something like
 | |
| ``assert 'argument_name' in kwargs`` in the constructor.
 | |
| 
 | |
| .. _using-managers-in-migrations:
 | |
| 
 | |
| Model managers
 | |
| ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
 | |
| 
 | |
| .. versionadded:: 1.8
 | |
| 
 | |
| You can optionally serialize managers into migrations and have them available
 | |
| in :class:`~django.db.migrations.operations.RunPython` operations. This is done
 | |
| by defining a ``use_in_migrations`` attribute on the manager class::
 | |
| 
 | |
|     class MyManager(models.Manager):
 | |
|         use_in_migrations = True
 | |
| 
 | |
|     class MyModel(models.Model):
 | |
|         objects = MyManager()
 | |
| 
 | |
| If you are using the :meth:`~django.db.models.from_queryset` function to
 | |
| dynamically generate a manager class, you need to inherit from the generated
 | |
| class to make it importable::
 | |
| 
 | |
|     class MyManager(MyBaseManager.from_queryset(CustomQuerySet)):
 | |
|         use_in_migrations = True
 | |
| 
 | |
|     class MyModel(models.Model):
 | |
|         objects = MyManager()
 | |
| 
 | |
| Please refer to the notes about :ref:`historical-models` in migrations to see
 | |
| the implications that come along.
 | |
| 
 | |
| Adding migrations to apps
 | |
| -------------------------
 | |
| 
 | |
| Adding migrations to new apps is straightforward - they come preconfigured to
 | |
| accept migrations, and so just run :djadmin:`makemigrations` once you've made
 | |
| some changes.
 | |
| 
 | |
| If your app already has models and database tables, and doesn't have migrations
 | |
| yet (for example, you created it against a previous Django version), you'll
 | |
| need to convert it to use migrations; this is a simple process::
 | |
| 
 | |
|     $ python manage.py makemigrations your_app_label
 | |
| 
 | |
| This will make a new initial migration for your app. Now, run ``python
 | |
| manage.py migrate --fake-initial``, and Django will detect that you have an
 | |
| initial migration *and* that the tables it wants to create already exist, and
 | |
| will mark the migration as already applied. (Without the
 | |
| :djadminopt:`--fake-initial` flag, the :djadmin:`migrate` command would error
 | |
| out because the tables it wants to create already exist.)
 | |
| 
 | |
| Note that this only works given two things:
 | |
| 
 | |
| * You have not changed your models since you made their tables. For migrations
 | |
|   to work, you must make the initial migration *first* and then make changes,
 | |
|   as Django compares changes against migration files, not the database.
 | |
| 
 | |
| * You have not manually edited your database - Django won't be able to detect
 | |
|   that your database doesn't match your models, you'll just get errors when
 | |
|   migrations try to modify those tables.
 | |
| 
 | |
| .. versionchanged: 1.8
 | |
| 
 | |
|     The ``--fake-initial`` flag to :djadmin:`migrate` was added. Previously,
 | |
|     Django would always automatically fake-apply initial migrations if it
 | |
|     detected that the tables exist.
 | |
| 
 | |
| .. _historical-models:
 | |
| 
 | |
| Historical models
 | |
| -----------------
 | |
| 
 | |
| When you run migrations, Django is working from historical versions of your
 | |
| models stored in the migration files. If you write Python code using the
 | |
| :class:`~django.db.migrations.operations.RunPython` operation, or if you have
 | |
| ``allow_migrate`` methods on your database routers, you will be exposed to
 | |
| these versions of your models.
 | |
| 
 | |
| Because it's impossible to serialize arbitrary Python code, these historical
 | |
| models will not have any custom methods that you have defined. They will,
 | |
| however, have the same fields, relationships, managers (limited to those with
 | |
| ``use_in_migrations = True``) and ``Meta`` options (also versioned, so they may
 | |
| be different from your current ones).
 | |
| 
 | |
| .. warning::
 | |
| 
 | |
|   This means that you will NOT have custom ``save()`` methods called on objects
 | |
|   when you access them in migrations, and you will NOT have any custom
 | |
|   constructors or instance methods. Plan appropriately!
 | |
| 
 | |
| References to functions in field options such as ``upload_to`` and
 | |
| ``limit_choices_to`` and model manager declarations with managers having
 | |
| ``use_in_migrations = True`` are serialized in migrations, so the functions and
 | |
| classes will need to be kept around for as long as there is a migration
 | |
| referencing them. Any :doc:`custom model fields </howto/custom-model-fields>`
 | |
| will also need to be kept, since these are imported directly by migrations.
 | |
| 
 | |
| In addition, the base classes of the model are just stored as pointers, so you
 | |
| must always keep base classes around for as long as there is a migration that
 | |
| contains a reference to them. On the plus side, methods and managers from these
 | |
| base classes inherit normally, so if you absolutely need access to these you
 | |
| can opt to move them into a superclass.
 | |
| 
 | |
| .. _migrations-removing-model-fields:
 | |
| 
 | |
| Considerations when removing model fields
 | |
| -----------------------------------------
 | |
| 
 | |
| .. versionadded:: 1.8
 | |
| 
 | |
| Similar to the "references to historical functions" considerations described in
 | |
| the previous section, removing custom model fields from your project or
 | |
| third-party app will cause a problem if they are referenced in old migrations.
 | |
| 
 | |
| To help with this situation, Django provides some model field attributes to
 | |
| assist with model field deprecation using the :doc:`system checks framework
 | |
| </topics/checks>`.
 | |
| 
 | |
| Add the ``system_check_deprecated_details`` attribute to your model field
 | |
| similar to the following::
 | |
| 
 | |
|     class IPAddressField(Field):
 | |
|         system_check_deprecated_details = {
 | |
|             'msg': (
 | |
|                 'IPAddressField has been deprecated. Support for it (except '
 | |
|                 'in historical migrations) will be removed in Django 1.9.'
 | |
|             ),
 | |
|             'hint': 'Use GenericIPAddressField instead.',  # optional
 | |
|             'id': 'fields.W900',  # pick a unique ID for your field.
 | |
|         }
 | |
| 
 | |
| After a deprecation period of your choosing (two major releases for fields in
 | |
| Django itself), change the ``system_check_deprecated_details`` attribute to
 | |
| ``system_check_removed_details`` and update the dictionary similar to::
 | |
| 
 | |
|     class IPAddressField(Field):
 | |
|         system_check_removed_details = {
 | |
|             'msg': (
 | |
|                 'IPAddressField has been removed except for support in '
 | |
|                 'historical migrations.'
 | |
|             ),
 | |
|             'hint': 'Use GenericIPAddressField instead.',
 | |
|             'id': 'fields.E900',  # pick a unique ID for your field.
 | |
|         }
 | |
| 
 | |
| You should keep the field's methods that are required for it to operate in
 | |
| database migrations such as ``__init__()``, ``deconstruct()``, and
 | |
| ``get_internal_type()``. Keep this stub field for as long as any migrations
 | |
| which reference the field exist. For example, after squashing migrations and
 | |
| removing the old ones, you should be able to remove the field completely.
 | |
| 
 | |
| .. _data-migrations:
 | |
| 
 | |
| Data Migrations
 | |
| ---------------
 | |
| 
 | |
| As well as changing the database schema, you can also use migrations to change
 | |
| the data in the database itself, in conjunction with the schema if you want.
 | |
| 
 | |
| Migrations that alter data are usually called "data migrations"; they're best
 | |
| written as separate migrations, sitting alongside your schema migrations.
 | |
| 
 | |
| Django can't automatically generate data migrations for you, as it does with
 | |
| schema migrations, but it's not very hard to write them. Migration files in
 | |
| Django are made up of :doc:`Operations </ref/migration-operations>`, and
 | |
| the main operation you use for data migrations is
 | |
| :class:`~django.db.migrations.operations.RunPython`.
 | |
| 
 | |
| To start, make an empty migration file you can work from (Django will put
 | |
| the file in the right place, suggest a name, and add dependencies for you)::
 | |
| 
 | |
|     python manage.py makemigrations --empty yourappname
 | |
| 
 | |
| Then, open up the file; it should look something like this::
 | |
| 
 | |
|     # -*- coding: utf-8 -*-
 | |
|     from django.db import models, migrations
 | |
| 
 | |
|     class Migration(migrations.Migration):
 | |
| 
 | |
|         dependencies = [
 | |
|             ('yourappname', '0001_initial'),
 | |
|         ]
 | |
| 
 | |
|         operations = [
 | |
|         ]
 | |
| 
 | |
| Now, all you need to do is create a new function and have
 | |
| :class:`~django.db.migrations.operations.RunPython` use it.
 | |
| :class:`~django.db.migrations.operations.RunPython` expects a callable as its argument
 | |
| which takes two arguments - the first is an :doc:`app registry
 | |
| </ref/applications/>` that has the historical versions of all your models
 | |
| loaded into it to match where in your history the migration sits, and the
 | |
| second is a :doc:`SchemaEditor </ref/schema-editor>`, which you can use to
 | |
| manually effect database schema changes (but beware, doing this can confuse
 | |
| the migration autodetector!)
 | |
| 
 | |
| Let's write a simple migration that populates our new ``name`` field with the
 | |
| combined values of ``first_name`` and ``last_name`` (we've come to our senses
 | |
| and realized that not everyone has first and last names). All we
 | |
| need to do is use the historical model and iterate over the rows::
 | |
| 
 | |
|     # -*- coding: utf-8 -*-
 | |
|     from django.db import models, migrations
 | |
| 
 | |
|     def combine_names(apps, schema_editor):
 | |
|         # We can't import the Person model directly as it may be a newer
 | |
|         # version than this migration expects. We use the historical version.
 | |
|         Person = apps.get_model("yourappname", "Person")
 | |
|         for person in Person.objects.all():
 | |
|             person.name = "%s %s" % (person.first_name, person.last_name)
 | |
|             person.save()
 | |
| 
 | |
|     class Migration(migrations.Migration):
 | |
| 
 | |
|         dependencies = [
 | |
|             ('yourappname', '0001_initial'),
 | |
|         ]
 | |
| 
 | |
|         operations = [
 | |
|             migrations.RunPython(combine_names),
 | |
|         ]
 | |
| 
 | |
| Once that's done, we can just run ``python manage.py migrate`` as normal and
 | |
| the data migration will run in place alongside other migrations.
 | |
| 
 | |
| You can pass a second callable to
 | |
| :class:`~django.db.migrations.operations.RunPython` to run whatever logic you
 | |
| want executed when migrating backwards. If this callable is omitted, migrating
 | |
| backwards will raise an exception.
 | |
| 
 | |
| More advanced migrations
 | |
| ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
 | |
| 
 | |
| If you're interested in the more advanced migration operations, or want
 | |
| to be able to write your own, see the :doc:`migration operations reference
 | |
| </ref/migration-operations>` and the "how-to" on :doc:`writing migrations
 | |
| </howto/writing-migrations>`.
 | |
| 
 | |
| .. _migration-squashing:
 | |
| 
 | |
| Squashing migrations
 | |
| --------------------
 | |
| 
 | |
| You are encouraged to make migrations freely and not worry about how many you
 | |
| have; the migration code is optimized to deal with hundreds at a time without
 | |
| much slowdown. However, eventually you will want to move back from having
 | |
| several hundred migrations to just a few, and that's where squashing comes in.
 | |
| 
 | |
| Squashing is the act of reducing an existing set of many migrations down to
 | |
| one (or sometimes a few) migrations which still represent the same changes.
 | |
| 
 | |
| Django does this by taking all of your existing migrations, extracting their
 | |
| ``Operation``\s and putting them all in sequence, and then running an optimizer
 | |
| over them to try and reduce the length of the list - for example, it knows
 | |
| that :class:`~django.db.migrations.operations.CreateModel` and
 | |
| :class:`~django.db.migrations.operations.DeleteModel` cancel each other out,
 | |
| and it knows that :class:`~django.db.migrations.operations.AddField` can be
 | |
| rolled into :class:`~django.db.migrations.operations.CreateModel`.
 | |
| 
 | |
| Once the operation sequence has been reduced as much as possible - the amount
 | |
| possible depends on how closely intertwined your models are and if you have
 | |
| any :class:`~django.db.migrations.operations.RunSQL`
 | |
| or :class:`~django.db.migrations.operations.RunPython` operations (which can't
 | |
| be optimized through) - Django will then write it back out into a new set of
 | |
| initial migration files.
 | |
| 
 | |
| These files are marked to say they replace the previously-squashed migrations,
 | |
| so they can coexist with the old migration files, and Django will intelligently
 | |
| switch between them depending where you are in the history. If you're still
 | |
| part-way through the set of migrations that you squashed, it will keep using
 | |
| them until it hits the end and then switch to the squashed history, while new
 | |
| installs will just use the new squashed migration and skip all the old ones.
 | |
| 
 | |
| This enables you to squash and not mess up systems currently in production
 | |
| that aren't fully up-to-date yet. The recommended process is to squash, keeping
 | |
| the old files, commit and release, wait until all systems are upgraded with
 | |
| the new release (or if you're a third-party project, just ensure your users
 | |
| upgrade releases in order without skipping any), and then remove the old files,
 | |
| commit and do a second release.
 | |
| 
 | |
| The command that backs all this is :djadmin:`squashmigrations` - just pass
 | |
| it the app label and migration name you want to squash up to, and it'll get to
 | |
| work::
 | |
| 
 | |
|   $ ./manage.py squashmigrations myapp 0004
 | |
|   Will squash the following migrations:
 | |
|    - 0001_initial
 | |
|    - 0002_some_change
 | |
|    - 0003_another_change
 | |
|    - 0004_undo_something
 | |
|   Do you wish to proceed? [yN] y
 | |
|   Optimizing...
 | |
|     Optimized from 12 operations to 7 operations.
 | |
|   Created new squashed migration /home/andrew/Programs/DjangoTest/test/migrations/0001_squashed_0004_undo_somthing.py
 | |
|     You should commit this migration but leave the old ones in place;
 | |
|     the new migration will be used for new installs. Once you are sure
 | |
|     all instances of the codebase have applied the migrations you squashed,
 | |
|     you can delete them.
 | |
| 
 | |
| Note that model interdependencies in Django can get very complex, and squashing
 | |
| may result in migrations that do not run; either mis-optimized (in which case
 | |
| you can try again with ``--no-optimize``, though you should also report an issue),
 | |
| or with a ``CircularDependencyError``, in which case you can manually resolve it.
 | |
| 
 | |
| To manually resolve a ``CircularDependencyError``, break out one of
 | |
| the ForeignKeys in the circular dependency loop into a separate
 | |
| migration, and move the dependency on the other app with it. If you're unsure,
 | |
| see how makemigrations deals with the problem when asked to create brand
 | |
| new migrations from your models. In a future release of Django, squashmigrations
 | |
| will be updated to attempt to resolve these errors itself.
 | |
| 
 | |
| Once you've squashed your migration, you should then commit it alongside the
 | |
| migrations it replaces and distribute this change to all running instances
 | |
| of your application, making sure that they run ``migrate`` to store the change
 | |
| in their database.
 | |
| 
 | |
| After this has been done, you must then transition the squashed migration to
 | |
| a normal initial migration, by:
 | |
| 
 | |
| - Deleting all the migration files it replaces
 | |
| - Removing the ``replaces`` argument in the ``Migration`` class of the
 | |
|   squashed migration (this is how Django tells that it is a squashed migration)
 | |
| 
 | |
| .. note::
 | |
|     Once you've squashed a migration, you should not then re-squash that squashed
 | |
|     migration until you have fully transitioned it to a normal migration.
 | |
| 
 | |
| 
 | |
| .. _migration-serializing:
 | |
| 
 | |
| Serializing values
 | |
| ------------------
 | |
| 
 | |
| Migrations are just Python files containing the old definitions of your models
 | |
| - thus, to write them, Django must take the current state of your models and
 | |
| serialize them out into a file.
 | |
| 
 | |
| While Django can serialize most things, there are some things that we just
 | |
| can't serialize out into a valid Python representation - there's no Python
 | |
| standard for how a value can be turned back into code (``repr()`` only works
 | |
| for basic values, and doesn't specify import paths).
 | |
| 
 | |
| Django can serialize the following:
 | |
| 
 | |
| - ``int``, ``long``, ``float``, ``bool``, ``str``, ``unicode``, ``bytes``, ``None``
 | |
| - ``list``, ``set``, ``tuple``, ``dict``
 | |
| - ``datetime.date``, ``datetime.time``, and ``datetime.datetime`` instances
 | |
|   (include those that are timezone-aware)
 | |
| - ``decimal.Decimal`` instances
 | |
| - Any Django field
 | |
| - Any function or method reference (e.g. ``datetime.datetime.today``) (must be in module's top-level scope)
 | |
| - Any class reference (must be in module's top-level scope)
 | |
| - Anything with a custom ``deconstruct()`` method (:ref:`see below <custom-deconstruct-method>`)
 | |
| 
 | |
| .. versionchanged:: 1.7.1
 | |
| 
 | |
|     Support for serializing timezone-aware datetimes was added.
 | |
| 
 | |
| Django can serialize the following on Python 3 only:
 | |
| 
 | |
| - Unbound methods used from within the class body (see below)
 | |
| 
 | |
| Django cannot serialize:
 | |
| 
 | |
| - Nested classes
 | |
| - Arbitrary class instances (e.g. ``MyClass(4.3, 5.7)``)
 | |
| - Lambdas
 | |
| 
 | |
| Due to the fact ``__qualname__`` was only introduced in Python 3, Django can only
 | |
| serialize the following pattern (an unbound method used within the class body)
 | |
| on Python 3, and will fail to serialize a reference to it on Python 2::
 | |
| 
 | |
|     class MyModel(models.Model):
 | |
| 
 | |
|         def upload_to(self):
 | |
|             return "something dynamic"
 | |
| 
 | |
|         my_file = models.FileField(upload_to=upload_to)
 | |
| 
 | |
| If you are using Python 2, we recommend you move your methods for upload_to
 | |
| and similar arguments that accept callables (e.g. ``default``) to live in
 | |
| the main module body, rather than the class body.
 | |
| 
 | |
| .. _custom-deconstruct-method:
 | |
| 
 | |
| Adding a deconstruct() method
 | |
| ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
 | |
| 
 | |
| You can let Django serialize your own custom class instances by giving the class
 | |
| a ``deconstruct()`` method. It takes no arguments, and should return a tuple
 | |
| of three things ``(path, args, kwargs)``:
 | |
| 
 | |
| * ``path`` should be the Python path to the class, with the class name included
 | |
|   as the last part (for example, ``myapp.custom_things.MyClass``). If your
 | |
|   class is not available at the top level of a module it is not serializable.
 | |
| 
 | |
| * ``args`` should be a list of positional arguments to pass to your class'
 | |
|   ``__init__`` method. Everything in this list should itself be serializable.
 | |
| 
 | |
| * ``kwargs`` should be a dict of keyword arguments to pass to your class'
 | |
|   ``__init__`` method. Every value should itself be serializable.
 | |
| 
 | |
| .. note::
 | |
| 
 | |
|     This return value is different from the ``deconstruct()`` method
 | |
|     :ref:`for custom fields <custom-field-deconstruct-method>` which returns a
 | |
|     tuple of four items.
 | |
| 
 | |
| Django will write out the value as an instantiation of your class with the
 | |
| given arguments, similar to the way it writes out references to Django fields.
 | |
| 
 | |
| To prevent a new migration from being created each time
 | |
| :djadmin:`makemigrations` is run, you should also add a ``__eq__()`` method to
 | |
| the decorated class. This function will be called by Django's migration
 | |
| framework to detect changes between states.
 | |
| 
 | |
| As long as all of the arguments to your class' constructor are themselves
 | |
| serializable, you can use the ``@deconstructible`` class decorator from
 | |
| ``django.utils.deconstruct`` to add the ``deconstruct()`` method::
 | |
| 
 | |
|     from django.utils.deconstruct import deconstructible
 | |
| 
 | |
|     @deconstructible
 | |
|     class MyCustomClass(object):
 | |
| 
 | |
|         def __init__(self, foo=1):
 | |
|             self.foo = foo
 | |
|             ...
 | |
| 
 | |
|         def __eq__(self, other):
 | |
|             return self.foo == other.foo
 | |
| 
 | |
| 
 | |
| The decorator adds logic to capture and preserve the arguments on their
 | |
| way into your constructor, and then returns those arguments exactly when
 | |
| deconstruct() is called.
 | |
| 
 | |
| Supporting Python 2 and 3
 | |
| -------------------------
 | |
| 
 | |
| In order to generate migrations that support both Python 2 and 3, all string
 | |
| literals used in your models and fields (e.g. ``verbose_name``,
 | |
| ``related_name``, etc.), must be consistently either bytestrings or text
 | |
| (unicode) strings in both Python 2 and 3 (rather than bytes in Python 2 and
 | |
| text in Python 3, the default situation for unmarked string literals.)
 | |
| Otherwise running :djadmin:`makemigrations` under Python 3 will generate
 | |
| spurious new migrations to convert all these string attributes to text.
 | |
| 
 | |
| The easiest way to achieve this is to follow the advice in Django's
 | |
| :doc:`Python 3 porting guide </topics/python3>` and make sure that all your
 | |
| modules begin with ``from __future__ import unicode_literals``, so that all
 | |
| unmarked string literals are always unicode, regardless of Python version. When
 | |
| you add this to an app with existing migrations generated on Python 2, your
 | |
| next run of :djadmin:`makemigrations` on Python 3 will likely generate many
 | |
| changes as it converts all the bytestring attributes to text strings; this is
 | |
| normal and should only happen once.
 | |
| 
 | |
| Supporting multiple Django versions
 | |
| -----------------------------------
 | |
| 
 | |
| If you are the maintainer of a third-party app with models, you may need to
 | |
| ship migrations that support multiple Django versions. In this case, you should
 | |
| always run :djadmin:`makemigrations` **with the lowest Django version you wish
 | |
| to support**.
 | |
| 
 | |
| The migrations system will maintain backwards-compatibility according to the
 | |
| same policy as the rest of Django, so migration files generated on Django X.Y
 | |
| should run unchanged on Django X.Y+1. The migrations system does not promise
 | |
| forwards-compatibility, however. New features may be added, and migration files
 | |
| generated with newer versions of Django may not work on older versions.
 | |
| 
 | |
| .. _upgrading-from-south:
 | |
| 
 | |
| Upgrading from South
 | |
| --------------------
 | |
| 
 | |
| If you already have pre-existing migrations created with
 | |
| `South <http://south.aeracode.org>`_, then the upgrade process to use
 | |
| ``django.db.migrations`` is quite simple:
 | |
| 
 | |
| * Ensure all installs are fully up-to-date with their migrations.
 | |
| * Remove ``'south'`` from :setting:`INSTALLED_APPS`.
 | |
| * Delete all your (numbered) migration files, but not the directory or
 | |
|   ``__init__.py`` - make sure you remove the ``.pyc`` files too.
 | |
| * Run ``python manage.py makemigrations``. Django should see the empty
 | |
|   migration directories and make new initial migrations in the new format.
 | |
| * Run ``python manage.py migrate --fake-initial``. Django will see that the
 | |
|   tables for the initial migrations already exist and mark them as applied
 | |
|   without running them. (Django won't check that the table schema match your
 | |
|   models, just that the right table names exist).
 | |
| 
 | |
| That's it! The only complication is if you have a circular dependency loop
 | |
| of foreign keys; in this case, ``makemigrations`` might make more than one
 | |
| initial migration, and you'll need to mark them all as applied using::
 | |
| 
 | |
|     python manage.py migrate --fake yourappnamehere
 | |
| 
 | |
| .. versionchanged:: 1.8
 | |
| 
 | |
|     The :djadminopt:`--fake-initial` flag was added to :djadmin:`migrate`;
 | |
|     previously, initial migrations were always automatically fake-applied if
 | |
|     existing tables were detected.
 | |
| 
 | |
| Libraries/Third-party Apps
 | |
| ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
 | |
| 
 | |
| If you are a library or app maintainer, and wish to support both South migrations
 | |
| (for Django 1.6 and below) and Django migrations (for 1.7 and above) you should
 | |
| keep two parallel migration sets in your app, one in each format.
 | |
| 
 | |
| To aid in this, South 1.0 will automatically look for South-format migrations
 | |
| in a ``south_migrations`` directory first, before looking in ``migrations``,
 | |
| meaning that users' projects will transparently use the correct set as long
 | |
| as you put your South migrations in the ``south_migrations`` directory and
 | |
| your Django migrations in the ``migrations`` directory.
 | |
| 
 | |
| More information is available in the
 | |
| `South 1.0 release notes <http://south.readthedocs.org/en/latest/releasenotes/1.0.html#library-migration-path>`_.
 | |
| 
 | |
| .. seealso::
 | |
| 
 | |
|     :doc:`The Migrations Operations Reference </ref/migration-operations>`
 | |
|         Covers the schema operations API, special operations, and writing your
 | |
|         own operations.
 | |
| 
 | |
|     :doc:`The Writing Migrations "how-to" </howto/writing-migrations>`
 | |
|         Explains how to structure and write database migrations for different
 | |
|         scenarios you might encounter.
 |