mirror of
				https://github.com/django/django.git
				synced 2025-10-31 09:41:08 +00:00 
			
		
		
		
	cater for running tests from another directory than tests - applying existing pattern to newly added test_testcase_ordering as well
This commit is contained in:
		| @@ -104,17 +104,18 @@ class DiscoverRunnerTest(TestCase): | ||||
|         self.assertEqual(count, 0) | ||||
|  | ||||
|     def test_testcase_ordering(self): | ||||
|         suite = DiscoverRunner().build_suite(["test_discovery_sample/"]) | ||||
|         self.assertEqual( | ||||
|             suite._tests[0].__class__.__name__, | ||||
|             'TestDjangoTestCase', | ||||
|             msg="TestDjangoTestCase should be the first test case") | ||||
|         self.assertEqual( | ||||
|             suite._tests[1].__class__.__name__, | ||||
|             'TestZimpleTestCase', | ||||
|             msg="TestZimpleTestCase should be the second test case") | ||||
|         # All others can follow in unspecified order, including doctests | ||||
|         self.assertIn('DocTestCase', [t.__class__.__name__ for t in suite._tests[2:]]) | ||||
|         with change_cwd(".."): | ||||
|             suite = DiscoverRunner().build_suite(["test_discovery_sample/"]) | ||||
|             self.assertEqual( | ||||
|                 suite._tests[0].__class__.__name__, | ||||
|                 'TestDjangoTestCase', | ||||
|                 msg="TestDjangoTestCase should be the first test case") | ||||
|             self.assertEqual( | ||||
|                 suite._tests[1].__class__.__name__, | ||||
|                 'TestZimpleTestCase', | ||||
|                 msg="TestZimpleTestCase should be the second test case") | ||||
|             # All others can follow in unspecified order, including doctests | ||||
|             self.assertIn('DocTestCase', [t.__class__.__name__ for t in suite._tests[2:]]) | ||||
|  | ||||
|     def test_overrideable_test_suite(self): | ||||
|         self.assertEqual(DiscoverRunner().test_suite, TestSuite) | ||||
|   | ||||
		Reference in New Issue
	
	Block a user